Why Used EV Loans Could Cost More Than ICE Financing

Higher down payments, shorter tenures and cautious loan-to-value assumptions could make financing a used EV more expensive than financing an equivalent conventional vehicle, as lenders struggle to assess how much the asset will be worth at the end of the loan.

Financing is emerging as one of the biggest friction points in India’s nascent pre-owned EV market. Banks and NBFCs have decades of resale and depreciation data for internal combustion engine vehicles, allowing them to estimate collateral value relatively confidently. Used EVs offer a much thinner historical record.

For lenders, that uncertainty matters because the vehicle itself is the underlying asset securing the loan. If its future resale value is difficult to estimate, the lender has to price that additional risk into the financing structure.

Higher Risk Can Mean Tougher Loan Terms

Alpna Jain, Co-Founder and Chief Business Officer, Drivn, said, “When lenders can't confidently estimate whether a three-year-old EV will retain 35%, 45% or 55% of its original value, they respond the only way risk models know how, with higher down payments, lower loan-to-value ratios and higher financing costs.”

A lower loan-to-value ratio means buyers must fund a larger portion of the vehicle upfront. Shorter repayment periods can further increase monthly instalments, reducing one of the principal attractions of buying pre-owned — affordability. Sahil Jindal, Co-Founder, Trevel, said, “Uncertain resale values make lenders cautious, so used EVs attract higher rates and shorter tenures. Buyers then default to petrol cars they understand.”

The issue becomes particularly important in price-sensitive segments where financing determines whether a buyer can enter the market at all. Pankaj Goyal, Co-Founder and COO, AutoNXT, said, “Lenders need greater confidence in the residual value and lifecycle economics of EVs before offering financing products comparable to those available for ICE vehicles.”

Fleet Economics Raise The Stakes

For commercial operators, financing affects more than the purchase decision. Vehicle replacement cycles, monthly cash flows and the ability to scale fleets depend on the cost and availability of credit. Aaditya Mishra, Co-Founder and Chief Growth Officer, Luxorides, said, “For mobility and fleet businesses, predictable residual values are especially important because they influence vehicle replacement cycles and overall fleet economics.”

As the secondary market matures, lenders will gain more repayment, resale and depreciation data on electric vehicles. That should allow risk models to become more granular instead of treating used EVs as a relatively unfamiliar asset class.

But until lenders can estimate future value with greater confidence, financing may remain more conservative than for comparable ICE vehicles. That could slow adoption even where the purchase price and running-cost economics of a used EV appear attractive.